NSE suggests ETF route for Rajiv Gandhi equity plan

Even as the exact contours of the newly-proposed Rajiv Gandhi Equity Savings Scheme (RGESS) are being worked out, another suggestion has landed in the finance ministry’s lap.

The country’s largest equity bourse has made a representation to the ministry, suggesting the funds coming from the tax-saving scheme be invested in the stock market via exchange traded funds (ETFs).

According to sources, the National Stock Exchange (NSE) has recommended the ETF route for RGESS funds as a diversified and less risky way to invest in stocks.

Introduced in this year’s Budget, RGESS will give tax benefit to small investors putting money directly in equities. However, the idea of encouraging unexperienced retail investors to take direct exposure to stocks has faced widespread criticism.

Many entities, including the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi), had suggested the scheme be routed through mutual funds. However, recent reports suggest the finance ministry isn’t keen on letting mutual funds operate the scheme.

Experts say encouraging small investors to invest directly in the market would be very risky. The ETF option is worth considering, they say.

Investing in ETFs is akin to investing in a basket of securities. ETFs are gaining popularity globally as an investment vehicle for taking passive exposure to asset classes, including equities and gold.

However, equity ETFs are yet to gain much currency in India. Even as there are about 19 such ETFs available in the Indian market, they have less than Rs 1,200 crore of total assets under management, according to data from Value Research.

According to experts, if NSE’s proposal is accepted, it will be a big boost for the country’s ETF market, with several new launches likely.

According to estimates, the RGESS scheme has the potential to attract up to Rs 50,000 crore of retail inflows every year into the stock market.

“The current crop of equity ETFs is mostly confined to Nifty and Sensex. The government can prescribe an ETF on the top 100 stocks or a public sector undertaking-specific ETF if it’s okay with the idea,” said an ETF fund manager with a domestic fund house, who did not wish to be identified.

The launch of new ETFs could benefit stock exchanges as well since they charge a one-time listing fees for letting them use their platform. According to Sebi, listing of ETFs on stock exchanges is mandatory.

Source: http://www.business-standard.com/india/news/nse-suggests-etf-route-for-rajiv-gandhi-equity-plan/475947/

 

There is scope for 100 more AMCs to come: Sundeep Sikka

Even though Reliance Mutual Fund has lost the top position in terms of assets under management (AUM) to HDFC Mutual Fund, it still remains the most profitable fund house in the country. In an interview with Chandan Kishore Kant and Jinsy Mathew, Chief Executive Officer Sundeep Sikka says the fund house is not concerned about the ranking and is trying to increase the share of retail money in its total AUM. Excerpts:

After remaining at top for almost five years, how has life changed for you after being dethroned by HDFC MF in mid-last year?
There is an obsession with AUM and that is where one gets de-focused when we talk about mutual fund industry. It is not so that only No. 1 gets money and No. 2 does not. Going by that logic, if only No. 1 has to get the money then there would have been no industry anywhere. I think that’s not the right way to see it. We, as a fund house, have been focused on adding more and more retail investors and creating wealth for them. What we did in the last 5-7 years has resulted into one of the largest retail bases with around 70 lakh investors, which includes 20 lakh investors through Systematic Investment Plans (SIPs). As long as we are able to keep getting new retail investors to the industry, there is nothing to do with the ranking.

Would you blame the banks and corporates, which had their liquid investments in Reliance Mutual Fund, for pulling you one notch down?
It’s not the question of blaming anyone. Seventy per cent of industry’s assets are institutional while rest is retail. Institutional money will continue to be a function of liquidity in the economy. Ultimately that money parked with mutual funds has to be used for projects as and when the capex is there. Liquidity will have an impact on the AUM of the industry, but that is not our core focus. Our liquid money, as a percentage of our total AUM, is at an all time low. We are trying to replace corporate money with retail investors. Sixty per cent of the Indian household savings is with the banks. It’s going to change. When will it change? I don’t know but what we are trying to do is to be ready to grab the opportunity whenever this change happens.

The industry is passing through one of the toughest phases. With investors fleeing and market conditions continue to remain poor, how things would pan out for the Indian mutual fund industry?
We should stop seeing the industry from a quarterly or half-yearly perspective. A lot of things are being done from a long-term perspective, say 5-10 years. We need to focus and launch simple products for investors so that the household savings in India can be moved into mutual funds. As an industry, we are at a very nascent stage, with less than 2 per cent of the population investing in mutual funds. This industry has potential to become five-ten times bigger in the next 10 years. There is a clear slowdown in the industry. In the last 2-3 years, because of market conditions, investors have not made money. Since 2008, it has taken lot for the industry to reconcile and get used to new business models. And the new business models are bit more expensive because we have seen a break down in the distribution network. What I mean is the link between the AMCs and the investors, lot of distributors are out of the industry which has pushed up cost of acquisition (of investors). From longer term point of view, volumes will compensate the falling margins and we need to have volumes as it is becoming a low margin game.

Your deal of selling 26 per cent stake to Nippon Life is being opposed by trade union in the Employees Provident Fund Organisation (EPFO). What went wrong?
We have applied to EPFO as we planned to get Nippon Life as a partner. Nippon will be taking 26 per cent stake. We are in line with the rules and regulations and one would appreciate the fact that this is the largest FDI deal in the sector. We are in the process of taking those approvals. Deal was finalised, MoU was signed and share holding will change only after getting approvals from all the concerned authorities. I am sure we will see the deal getting cleared. Competition Commission of India (CCI) already has cleared this and I don’t see any problem from EPFO.

This year has witnessed several deals in the mutual fund space. Is there scope for more mergers and acquisitions?
India has yet to see the potential of asset management space. A lot of foreign players are seeing much more in India than may be the industry itself. Every new foreign player coming in clearly explains that their global footprint is incomplete without India. So in India where 2 per cent of the population is investing in mutual funds far less than what they put in bank deposits, I believe there is a scope for 100 more AMCs to come. Every AMC will need to develop its niche and work out its business model. Industry is going to become far more bigger from here. It’s too early for us to discuss about the number of players, as right now industry can grow manifolds from here.

What is needed then for the industry during such times?
The industry has changed a lot from 2008 till now. Every shareholder and the management has to sit down and work out its own business plan. This industry definitely requires lot of patience from sponsors than what it used to have earlier. For a long term point of view it will be profitable but it will require lot more investment. Mutual fund sector needs shareholders’ patience, long term vision and execution capabilities to be successful. This industry is going to be big and profitable in times to come in the long run.

What is Reliance MF doing in such tumultuous times?
We are not looking at the short-term period of one or two quarters. We will keep investing in this time too. We are investing heavily on technology to increase our reach and reduce our transaction costs. We will keep investing for future. Short term cycle should not impact the long-term vision. There can be problems in short-term, but that does not stop us from investing for long-term. We are getting ready for the big opportunity, whenever it comes, and we are investing in all respect of our business.

Source: http://www.business-standard.com/india/news/there-is-scope-for-100-more-amcs-to-come-sundeep-sikka/475790/

 

Sebi asks govt to route Rajiv Gandhi Equity Scheme through MF

To minimize risk associated with direct stock investment for new investors, market regulator Sebi has asked the government to route tax-saving Rajiv Gandhi Equity Savings Scheme through MF.

Chairman of Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) U K Sinha today said the regulator has submitted a proposal in this regard to the Finance Ministry.

“The thinking in Sebi is that first time investors may not have adequate information about the stock market…they should enter the market through institutional investor,” he said.

“…is it right to expose an uninformed investor directly into the equity market or provide him access through Mutual Fund (MF),” he said.

He was responding to queries on RESS announced by Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee in his Budget speech.

The minister had announced 50 per cent tax deduction to retail investors with annual income of less than Rs 10 lakh for investment up to Rs 50,000 in a year with a lock-in period of three years under the scheme.

A retail investor can avail the scheme only once in a life time. This is the first-ever tax benefit scheme announced by the government to encourage retail investors participation in the equity market. By offering this scheme, the government aims at channelising household savings into stock markets.

Sinha also expressed concerned that penetration of MF industry in the retail sector is not improving.

However, he said “we are happy in one way that compared to 2010-11, in (2011-12) net inflow in equity schemes of MF is much higher”.

In 2010-11, net inflow in equity schemes of MF had declined by 13,000 crore, but in the following year it is positive by few hundred crores, he said adding the number of folios have declined.

Sinha said Sebi has set up a mechanism and was in talks with a “group of people” on how to increase the penetration of the industry.

On the Equity Linked Saving Schemes (ELSS), Sinha said there would be clarity once the Direct Taxes Code (DTC) Bill is finalised.

Source: http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2012-05-19/news/31778176_1_mutual-fund-retail-investors-mf

 

Strong dollar pushes up international funds performance

According to Value Research, a mutual fund tracking entity, International equity funds as a category have been successful over last one year by restricting losses to 3.52% outperforming other categories of diversified equity funds. Multi Cap and large cap funds as a category have lost 9.55% and 10.56% over one year.

Though Indian equity markets are weak for some time now with Nifty losing 11.41% and 11.71% over last one year and three months respectively, US dollar is the another reason for such outperformance by international funds. “Weak rupee does help funds holding dollar denominated assets and shows improvement in performance,” says Hiren Dhakan, associate fund manager, Bonanza Portfolio.

The case in point is Motilal Oswal Most Shares NASDAQ-100 ETF. It has delivered 31.14% returns over one year leaving behind most Indian diversified equity funds. The fund is an index fund and tracks NASDAQ-100 index. Over last three months the fund has delivered 9.55% returns when the underlying index is down 1.57%. The upside the fund has seen is an outcome of weak rupee against dollar.

Another fund from the international fund category that has done well with 11.70% is ING Global Real Estate Fund followed by Birla Sunlife International Equity Fund with 6.92% yearly return. “This may not be a great entry point in these funds, as global macro economic scenario is not encouraging and rupee is at a low against USD. Any positive move in rupee against USD, may wipe out returns offered by these funds,” add Hiren Dhakan.

Source: http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/personal-finance/mutual-funds/mf-news/strong-dollar-pushes-up-international-funds-performance/articleshow/13407074.cms

 

Top AMCs rake in more profits despite hard times.

India’s top asset management companies (AMCs) have continued to remain profitable, no matter whether mutual fund investors made money or not in the tough market conditions. Rather, top players have posted growth in their profitability during financial year 2011-12.

Reliance Mutual Fund, despite losing its top slot to HDFC MF during the year, continued to remain the most profitable asset manager in the industry, with Rs 276 crore as net profit in FY12, a growth of 5.6 per cent against Rs 261 crore in the previous financial year. HDFC MF, the country’s largest fund house, grew faster to Rs 269 crore, growth of 11 per cent compared with Rs 242 crore in FY11.

ICICI AMC, the third largest fund house, grew the fastest in terms of profitability, at 22.5 per cent to Rs 88 crore against Rs 72 crore earlier. However, Birla Sun Life AMC’s profit declined a big 30 per cent in FY12. The numbers of UTI AMC were not available.

Sundeep Sikka, chief executive officer (CEO), Reliance AMC, says, “The biggest factor which helped us increase our profits is our focus on retail customers from a long-term perspective. Though acquisition of retail is expensive, in the long term it becomes profitable. It’s an annuity business and our commitment to investors is for the long term.”

The top five control 54 per cent of the industry’s assets (there were 44 fund houses managing an average assets under management (AUM) of Rs 6,64,792 crore as on March 31). These players reported rise in profits in a year that saw erosion of a little over five per cent of the industry’s AUM, while equity AUM dipped 6.7 per cent.

According to Dhirendra Kumar, CEO of fund tracker firm Value Research, “The mutual fund business is a low capital one. Once a fund house reaches the threshold, it keeps making profits. And, the more the equity assets, it will kick up the profits of AMCs.”

Source: http://www.business-standard.com/india/news/top-amcs-rake-in-more-profits-despite-hard-times/474964/

 

Indian MF industry has immense growth potential: Jimmy A Patel, CEO, Quantum Mutual Fund

The Indian mutual fund industry is currently going through a rough patch. Not only are the industry’s assets under stress, but given the current macro-economic concerns, the survival of many of the relatively small and new fund houses is under doubt. With retail investors becoming more skeptical about the MF industry, the ET Intelligence Group attempts to address their concerns by asking industry veterans to give a fresh perspective on investment prospects, and the growth drivers and factors that are likely to impact mutual funds in India . Edited excerpts: 

Jimmy A Patel, CEO, Quantum Mutual Fund

How would you describe the current state of affairs in the Indian MF industry?
The Indian mutual fund industry has immense growth potential, and if aided well by technological advancements and increased awareness, MFs can be a major contributor to the overall Indian economy. However, it appears, the industry has not learnt from its past mistakes. The industry still seems to be operating on an asset gathering mandate, and not an asset managing one; the focus of the industry still seems to be driven by business agendas and not on building a community that is truly concerned about its investors; market share and “piece-of-the-wallet” concerns still precede issues like investor safety and delivery of risk-adjusted returns. The fund industry is still in a learning stage, though unfortunately, it seems to forget its earlier lessons all too soon

The MF industry, a few years ago, had set tall targets for itself. How far are we from achieving those targets?
Targets are necessary. It’s not just about achieving them, but more about moving in that direction. Rather than meeting a number, the industry should focus on becoming absolutely investor-friendly – right from the time an investor starts understanding about mutual funds through to the entire experience of helping him create wealth. Better regulations, advanced technology and conscientious managements will help in moving towards this aim.

Why should retail investors invest in funds when the future of many fund houses itself is in doldrums?
When you choose to invest with a fund house, you should ascertain its background well so that you can be sure of the future of your investments. In times such as now, retail investors should choose to get convinced about the investment philosophy of a fund house before investing in it, rather than get convinced by brilliant marketing gimmicks or aggressive distribution strategies. Investors must take care to choose their fund well.

Should the retail investor (today) go by the fund house or the scheme performance’s, especially if the scheme belongs to a smaller fund house?
If a fund is like a prospective life partner, a fund house is like its family. If you have solid family background backing your chosen partner, it reduces the scope of unwanted future uncertainties. However, the size of fund or a fund house has little to do with its performance. When you look at performance, consider consistent track records rather than spikes in returns, especially in the short term. A consistent fund will probably provide you with greater comfort in times of volatility as compared to a one-year star performer.

What do you think is the future of relatively smaller and newer fund houses?
The skepticism about the future of smaller fund houses is sheer speculation. Smaller fund houses will continue to do well in the coming years just like their larger peers. The Indian mutual fund industry has a bright future for transparent and ethical fund houses that are truly concerned about investors and focus on investor security and on delivering risk-adjusted returns, irrespective of their size or their years of existence.

Do you think the industry will consolidate in the coming years?
While the law of economics suggests consolidation, which would reduce costs greatly, different fund houses have different needs and objectives which might not sync favorably with such an approach. For all you know, several fund houses may not even go for consolidation; the moment they see their business becoming unviable they may just exit the business. This may be the case for foreign fund houses operating in India. Domestic fund houses again will not consolidate their business; they will try to survive the bad times… They will wait for a gain in their valuations before finding a partnership deal with some other player wanting to start an AMC business in the country.

In current times, when survival of the fittest holds water, what steps have you taken to ensure your existence? What are your strategies to sustain this business?
We are a different fund house. Being the only direct-to-investor fund house, we are constantly exploring new avenues to reach out to our investors and spread what we call “the Quantum way of investing”. Here again, the online medium would be our strength as we look to reach out to the base of over 100 million online Indians and bring them a better way of creating wealth over the long term. Some of our best ideas are a simple implementation of our investors’ feedback.

Do you think it is time the industry explored newer investment avenues – beyond equities, fixed income and gold?
Investors today are saturated with schemes. Investors are also paranoid about opaque markets, the disappointing corruption reports and repetitive scams. It thus, is the responsibility of the industry to collaborate to re-instill faith in investors, not by increasing the number of investor awareness programmes, or by launching new ad campaigns to promote this message, but by simply stepping away from the wallet-share game and retrospect on how they could best be asset managers working for the benefit of the end investor.

What is your advice to retail investors with respect to investing in mutual funds and equity markets?
The purpose of investing in MFs is to have a professionally managed portfolio of products that suit your requirement. An investor has a few basic requirements: one, create wealth over the long term for which you need an equity scheme; two, save tax for which you would need an Equity-Linked Savings Scheme; three, need to have some cash in reserve in case of an emergency for which you will need to look at a debt/liquid scheme; and four, need to counter equity exposure for which you could opt for a Gold ETF. These are the basic products that an investor needs to have, and not the hordes of schemes that clutter his portfolio.

Source: http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/features/investors-guide/indian-mf-industry-has-immense-growth-potential-jimmy-a-patel-ceo-quantum-mutual-fund/articleshow/13348012.cms?curpg=2

 

Fear grips the market again; what should you tell your investors?

Concerns over a possible Greek exit from the euro-zone and a lacklustre Indian economy have given Indian markets a double whammy. The Finance Minister’s announcement that austerity measures are needed has only added to the anxiety. In these tough times, what should you tell your investors? Read on to find out what top industry officials are saying.

Rajiv Anand, MD & CEO of Axis Mutual Fund, recommends that investors should invest through equity diversified funds and increase allocation to SIPs.

If you don’t think that India is going to grow at 7%, then you should buy fixed income. If you think that India is poised for a 7% growth then there is huge amount of value in stocks currently. If you want to build a high quality portfolio for the long term, then I think the market is providing you that opportunity now. If investors stay invested in diversified equity funds then they can’t go wrong.

Every year there is a different event. Events come and go. Today we are talking about Greece and in a year we’ll talk about some other event. Yes, there is no denying that there are issues in Europe but investors are probably not seeing that commodity prices have come down globally and are expected to fall even further. This is positive for India. Over a period of time that will percolate into the Indian economy.

We have heard distributors complaining that SIPs have not performed when there was a secular market upturn from 2003 to 2008. Now when the markets are falling people are complaining that they are not getting any returns. SIP is about disciplined investing and you need to eliminate emotions from investments. I would urge that investors should increase allocation in SIPs. Have faith and patience and you’ll be rewarded.

Ravi Gopalakrishnan, Executive Director, CIO–Equity, Pramerica Mutual Fund, suggests staying with large caps.

Volatility will continue for some more time. Apart from the global uncertainty we have our own problems as well. So it’s a double whammy. The European situation needs to stabilise, at least momentarily. Strong actions particularly on the reforms side are needed.

SIPs should always continue. Equity will remain to be the best asset class over the medium to long term. Markets only allow opportunities during these uncertain times. I would advise investors to look at diversified large cap funds because any recovery in the market will reflect in large cap stocks first. If there is any further uncertainty large caps are better placed to tackle volatility.

Debashish Mallick, MD & CEO of IDBI Mutual Fund, says that investors can look at index funds if they face difficulty choosing stocks.

Investors with risk appetite can invest in equities now through diversified funds. I would suggest steering clear from sector or thematic funds. SIPs should continue. Lump sum investment can also be done over next three months or more. At this juncture index funds also look good because the broader market has gone down. If you are unable to choose which stock to invest in, index funds are ideal.

Source: http://www.cafemutual.com/News/InnerNews.aspx?srno=1379&MainType=New&NewsType=Industry&id=21

 

Should investors abandon equities for good?

Things are really bleak. Most investors haven’t made any money in the past five years from the market. That is why it is very difficult to convince them about the long-term prospects of equity at the moment,” says the head of a large mutual fund in a rare moment of candour.

“If they are willing to listen, I can still try to convince them that the current trend is an exception, not the norm. Probably we are witnessing one of the darkest periods in history,” he adds.

There are many market participants – investment consultants, mutual fund officials and distributors, financial planners and so on – who share his bleak view.

The trouble is the situation is partly their creation. Not long ago, the same people were telling investors that long term means three years in the market. And they would also add in the same breath that stocks would beat all other asset classes in the long term.

Investors interpreted the message like this: if you invest in stocks for three years, you never lose money. In fact, you make a pot of gold.

However, things have changed. Investors are not so naive anymore. They have seen that their investments haven’t returned anything in the last few years. As for the experts, they can’t offer the same lines anymore to the harried investors who have lost or at best made single-digit returns from the market in the “long term”.

Worse, some of these investors are not even ready to listen to any amount of reasoning. They have mostly made up their mind that they are better off with conventional investment avenues like bank deposits, bonds and so on. They have already parted company with the stock market or are in the process of doing so.

The trend was in the making for a long time, confirmed by outflows from mutual fund schemes and the lower number of systematic investment plans (SIPs) in the recent past.

“Yes, we face similar questions. But I try to tell them that they are speaking with the benefit of hindsight. But we didn’t know at that time that the stock market would behave this way or the bank FDs and bonds would give this kind of returns,” says Suresh Sadagopan, founder, Ladder7 Financial Advisories.

“Despite so many point-to-point comparisons doing the rounds about underperformance of equity, long-term historical data proves that equity beats all other asset classes. So the theory that you should take the stock market route to meet your long-term goals still stands,” he adds.

How long is ‘long term’?

That brings us to the million dollar question that investors are asking the so-called experts: How long is “long term”.

“I believe five years can be counted as long term, even in the current scenario. I try to make them understand that they shouldn’t panic at the current situation because this is highly unusual. Typically, we see the Indian stock market moving cyclically every three years,” says Hemant Rustagi, CEO, Wiseinvest, a wealth management firm.

Source: http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/personal-finance/savings-centre/analysis/should-investors-abandon-equities-for-good/articleshow/13178968.cms

 

ICICI Prudential Mutual Fund Introduced SIP Insure

In a bid to provide both investment and life insurance cover for investors, ICICI Prudential mutual fund has introduced SIP Insure.

SIP insure is an add-on, optional feature available across 16 equity schemes of ICICI Prudential mutual fund. The cost of the insurance will be entirely borne by the Asset Management Company. No additional documents or medical tests will be required. However, investors only have to fill-up some details.

Feature will have uniform insurance cover. In the first year, the insurance cover will be ten times the monthly SIP installment. In the second year it will be fifty times the monthly SIP installment. From the third year it will be hundred times the monthly SIP installment. However, it will be subject to maximum insurance coverage of Rs 20 lakh a investor.

The life Cover will continue even if SIP stops. Minimum entry age is 18 years while maximum entry age is 46 years. The cover will continue up to the age of 55 years.

Source: http://www.policymantra.com/blog/news/3633-icici-prudential-mutual-fund-introduced-sip-insure.html

 

MFs assets shrink further, but don’t blame the entry load ban

Assets under management by Indian mutual fund houses breached the Rs 6 lakh crore mark in March 2012 on the downside, plunging to Rs 5,87,217 crore, while investor folios registered a decline of 7.2 lakh over the  September 2011 -March 2012 period,  according to data released by the Association of Mutual Funds in India.

Many in the mutual fund industry have blamed Sebi’s 2009 ban on entry loads – the charge deducted from your investment to pay for distribution costs – as the prime reason for this shrinkage. With little incentive to push mutual funds, sales of new units have fallen.

According to Crisil Research, mutual funds have lost close to eight lakh folios in the last fiscal. Many retail investors stopped their systematic investment plans (SIPs) and have  redeemed their fund investments as the equity market declined over 11 percent last year. The Reserve Bank order restricting bank investments in mutual funds to 10  percent (of their respective net worth) resulted in a 77 percent drop in bank folios, said the report.

Against this backdrop, the industry is hoping Sebi will reintroduce the entry load. A Mint article list three reasons for entertaining this hope:

“First, the industry claims MF folios have reduced, indicating that investors have moved out. Second, asset management companies (AMCs) aren’t making enough money and Fidelity Worldwide Investment’s sale of its Indian arm is being seen as some sort of endorsement to what they claim has made the MF industry unviable. And third, MFs claim that inflows have fallen, which means that investors simply aren’t investing in MFs, especially equity funds.”

But can the blame for the industry’s recent woes be laid at the door of a single investor-friendly reform measure?

Many experts believe that restoring the industry’s fortunes by bringing back the entry load could be a miscalculation. The end of entry loads (which could go upto 2.25 percent) improved the investible corpus and initial net asset values of investors. If marketed well, this should have got mutual funds more investors, not less.

The example of no-commission airline ticketing is illustrative. “Take the example of Air Asia, which is doing phenomenally well even without middlemen and agencies like makemytrip.com or yatra.com. A few years ago travel agents were fat cats, getting a lot of commission for tickets. Then came e-commerce and now  tickets are mostly booked on the net wherein commission is cut out and tickets are priced cheaper.  The mutual fund industry works the same way. Cut out the middleman’s charges and the business will still flourish,” an investment advisor told Firstpost.

Agents should be compensated for marketing and distribution through a system called high trail commission. For example, if an investor holds a fund for 10 years, then the agent should be credited by the fund for holding on to that client folio. This Trail Commission ensures that agents provide service on a long-term basis to investors, which discourages fly-by-night operators whose basic intention is to sell a product on a one-time basis to earn higher commission, explained a broker, on condition of anonymity.

To resume entry loads will surely be seen as a retrograde step that eats into investors’ savings and fattens the wallets of AMCs and their distributors.  However, the ban should have been carried out in a phased  manner. HN Sinor, chief executive of the Association of Mutual Funds in India, recently said  that Sebi made a mistake by implementing the entry load ban in a ‘cut-and-dried manner.’

Moreover, MF folios have not fallen only because of the entry-load ban. High bank deposit rates, a volatile, range-bound equity market, and uncertainties over ELSS  ( equity-linked-saving scheme) funds  due to the Direct Tax Code overhang is what has actually led to a fall in inflows in the last one year. Further, tax-free infrastructure bonds, which offer assured returns at a fixed rate, turned out to be a major draw, attracting inflows from investors as opposed to ELSS schemes.

“Based on returns and uncertainty in the global and local markets, investors have switched from equity to debt and gold— all mostly with plans with the mutual industry itself. The current diminishing assets under management are mirroring global uncertainty,” an ICICI Bank wealth manager told Firstpost.

Also the mutual funds sector saw high net worth individuals (HNIs) pulling their money out of the equity schemes of mutual funds in 2011-12 due to the bear market scenario. Clearly when the market goes down, high net worth investors  (HNIs) shift money to safer havens like tax-free bonds and term deposits.These instruments bear a coupon rate exceeding 9-9.5 percent on an annualised basis, making them more attractive than equity funds.

And not just HNIs, even domestic institutional investors  have opted to park money in gold funds ( these have gone up almost 30 percent in one year) as returns from equity have been negative for the last two years now.  Hence, even if equity markets have fallen, retail investors have found solace in fixed maturity plans that usually give a positive return of 9 percent plus on an annual basis. According to this Mint study, FMPs have almost doubled since September 2009.

Many asset management companies  that run mutual fund schemes merged their schemes last year, which was also one of the major reasons for decline in the number of folios. The mutual fund industry witnessed around 45 mergers in 2011-12 compared to only 58 mergers between 2006 and 2010.

Hence, a boost to the mutual fund industry can only come when equities start delivering superior, risk-adjusted returns. The current gloom suggests one might be better off holding on to cash, gold or property.

Source: http://www.firstpost.com/investing/mfs-assets-shrink-further-but-dont-blame-the-entry-load-ban-310103.html